Welcome to Sherlocks
The purpose of this page is to
logically think through what public education, the media, Hollywood, and TV has to offer
with regards to origins. It seeks to point out the concealed assumptions in evolutionary
propaganda (oops my bias is showing). It must be pointed out that everyone has a bias when
it comes to origins. Anyone who says he does not have a bias on this issue is just not
telling the truth!
There seems to be some strange power that suspends
faculties of logic and reason, and increases the capacity for gullibility when dealing
with origins. It must be recognized that the alternative to evolutionary origins is
creation by a personal God. Some people actively or through self deception, or
indifference just dont want to face the latter option. The thought that one may have
to stand before Jesus Christ at the end of ones journey is not a comforting one. But
what if this is really true? Is it not better to face this head on and deal with it or
should one just hope for the best and try and muddle through life here?
We are now living in a world where we are inundated
by "experts". The explosion of knowledge in this century has raised up experts
everywhere. Now the problem is, that among the good and helpful experts, we have those who
may be absolutely wrong in their area of expertise. Origins and the study of human
behavior are two areas which are prone to vain paths of efforts if the foundations of your
theory are erroneous. Did we evolve by time, chance and random processes or are we a
unique amazing creation of God. Are we basically good or are we marred by what scripture
calls the power of sin. With the right foundation you will find the truth, with the wrong
foundation you will forever be searching endless rabbit trails of futility.
We now live in a world, which has a media which is
so biased that certain views are actively censored. This is especially true with regards
to creationist views as well as anything to do with true Christianity. Oh yes, the media
will bring on a religious person who claims to represent real Christianity but they more
than likely have chopped up the word of God so as not to offend anyone and present such a
lame caricature of real Christianity it should be spewed out of ones mouth.
Our penchant for believing experts and the media no
matter what the subject is astounding. One person has said that some ideas are so
preposterous (i.e. evolution) that only an "expert" could believe in them!
Seeing, if you want, past the agendas, bias, concealed assumptions, illogical
conclusions, and discerning the truth requires a more investigative approach. Everybody
disseminating information (including yours truly) has a worldview that greatly affects
their conclusions and choices in life. If your worldview is wrong then your words and
actions will be like the blind leading the blind into the ditches of life.
It is a great tragedy that the public school systems
of North America are brainwashing the children with atheistic evolutionism. Of course its
not just educators who are at fault but many parents who have abdicated responsibility for
raising up their children in the way that they should go. They just give them to the
experts. We now have an educational system which actively leads vulnerable children away
from seeking a restored relationship with God through Jesus Christ. Instead it actively
promotes behavior which strengthens the power of sin in childrens lives. This is the
same anti-God philosophy that Communist nations used to brainwash their populations.
Everyone has seen the tragic results and destruction within those nations who attempted to
throw God out. The breakup of the public education monopoly in North America should be
done quickly to give all worldviews their rightful share of taxpayer dollars.
I say these things not to promote bad religion or
limit good science but to free up the education dollars that are currently being
monopolized by one worldview, which I believe, is sharply at odds with true reality. And
also to let educators and scientists follow their consciences without having to parrot the
party line of "atheistic secular humanistic evolutionism" in order to keep their
All my thoughts expressed here and in this web site
are due to Gods kind grace, spiritual sight and hopefully are true to His word. If
any are not or do not correctly represent the God of the Bible then I take credit for
Horn Yields Fresh Unfossilized Stretchy Bone Tissue
Microscopy expert Mark H. Armitage M.S, Ed.S., in May
2012 discovered a Triceratops horn in the Hell Creek formation
in Montana. Upon examining sections of the horn it was found
layers that were fresh and stretchy and not requiring
decalcification. In other wards more fresh dinosaur tissue which
calls into question the age of the dinosaurs same as Mary Schweitzers' fresh T-Rex tissue
per my write up farther down the Sherlock page!
Photos below are from Mark's expert and
rigorous microscopy analysis of the Triceratops horn.
Horn was found a couple feet below ground in a sandstone formation with
no special preservation features – was exposed to water,
freezing and thawing, mud, plants, bacteria, environmental
Fresh soft and
stretchy dinosaur tissue which did not require decalcification
Fresh soft and stretchy dinosaur tissue which
did not require decalcification
Forceps show pliability of the
Triceratops horn tissue
Interior of Triceratops horn showing
fresh blood vessels after decalcification
Fresh unfossilized Triceratops horn osteocyte cell
Incredibly detailed and still intact unfossilized Triceratops horn osteocyte cell
Mark H. Armitage, M.S., Ed.S. had
started his own non-profit organization to bring to light more
examples of dinosaur soft tissue around the globe.
Mark has setup an run a number of
electron microscopy labs and his micrographs have appeared in
many scientific journals.
https://dstri.org/index.html - Dinosaur Soft Tissue Research
Fresh Fossil Jurassic Squid Ink
That You Can Still Write With Claimed to be 150 Million Years
demolishing your own dating system through examining fossils! So
as if the fresh dinosaur tissue below isn't enough to abandon a
theory, now we are able to write with squid ink that is
allegedly 150 million years old! Hello, can we follow the
evidence to where it really leads?
Fresh Jurassic Squid Ink
by Brian Thomas, M.S. *
Over the past decade or so, scientific
research has revealed surprisingly young-looking features in
fossils and other artifacts dated in the millions of years. The
discoveries include blood vessels in T. rex,(1) and hadrosaur
fossil femurs,(2) mummified dinosaur stomach contents,(3)
mummified dinosaur skin,(4) live cells from amber deposits,(5)
fresh cellulose fibers in supposedly 250 million-year old salt
deposits,(6) DNA molecules from Neanderthal skeletons,(7) and
fossil feathers with clearly visible stripes.(8)
Now "150 million-year–old" squid ink, which
was so fresh that scientists used it to write with, adds further
doubt in deep time.
A one-inch-long squid ink sac, still
black, was discovered when UK paleontologists cracked open a
rock in Trowbridge, Wiltshire. After mixing its contents with
some liquid ammonia, the scientists were able to draw on paper a
picture of the extinct squid using its own ink.
Other similarly preserved creatures were
discovered nearby. Excavation leader Dr. Phil Wilby stated that
"throughout the world there are perhaps a few dozen examples of
soft parts being preserved, but this is really special. I can
dissect them as if they are living animals. You can even tell
whether it was a fast or slow swimmer, by looking at all the
It is as though fossils from around the
world and from strata at various depths are telling scientists
that they were all formed recently and rapidly in a catastrophic
event such as the global Flood described in Genesis.
Wilby also provided an inadvertent but
powerful admission of the young age of the earth by saying that
the squid ink was "fossilized so beautifully well that you can
actually still write with it. It still looks as if it is modern
squid ink. It's absolutely incredible to find something like
It is only "absolutely incredible" if
present geologic processes are presumed to have formed the rock
record. If the various strata represent millions and millions of
years, then "modern squid ink" in a fossil would be absolutely
incredible. In contrast, according to the creation science
model, most of the earth’s sedimentary strata were formed during
the year-long great Flood. Thus, news of fresh "Jurassic" ink is
perfectly consistent with a history based on the biblical
(1) Schweitzer, M. H. et al. 2005.
Soft-Tissue Vessels and Cellular Preservation in Tyrannosaurus
rex. Science. 307 (5717): 1952-1955.
(2) Schweitzer, M. H. et al. 2009.
Biomolecular Characterization and Protein Sequences of the
Campanian Hadrosaur B. Canadensis. Science. 324 (5927): 626-631.
(3) Thomas, B. The Dinosaur Mummy. ICR
News. Posted on icr.org September 25, 2008, accessed August 19,
(4) Manning, P. L. et al. 2009.
Mineralized soft-tissue structure and chemistry in a mummified
hadrosaur from the Hell Creek Formation, North Dakota (USA).
Proceedings of the Royal Society B. Published online before
print July 1, 2009.
(5) Greenblatt, C. L. et al. 2004.
Micrococcus luteus - Survival in Amber. Microbial Ecology. 48
(6) Griffith, J. D. et al. 2008. Discovery
of Abundant Cellulose Microfibers Encased in 250 Ma Permian
Halite: A Macromolecular Target in the Search for Life on Other
Planets. Astrobiology. 8 (2): 215-228.
(7) Krings, M. et al. 1997. Neandertal DNA
Sequences and the Origin of Modern Humans. Cell. 90 (1):19-30.
(8) Vinther, J. et al. 2008. The colour of
fossil feathers. Biology Letters. 4 (5): 522-525.
(9) The 150 million-year-old squid fossil
so perfectly preserved that scientists can make ink from its ink
sac. Archaeology Daily News. Posted on archaeologydaily.com
August 18, 2009, accessed August 19, 2009.
* Mr. Thomas is Science Writer at the
Institute for Creation Research.
Authentic Dinosaur figurines from the 4,000 year old Hongshan Culture
match Modern Day Fossil Recreations? Can you think through this
Did man and dinosaurs live
together? Did the Hongshan artisan carve from what he saw and
lived with? Or did the Hongshan culture have their own
paleontology department who dug up fossils, pieced them together
and recreated their own skin and flesh?
Same with these three
Petroglyph's from Answers in Genesis. Did the natives create
their rock art from seeing a living version of these? What does
that say about the age of the earth?
Confound Evolutionary Worldview
Have a look at
these 2 moths and tell me if time, blind chance, random mutations, and
natural selection could account for this artistry? Does natural selection
possess the intelligence to recognize the very very rare beneficial mutation
and somehow discard the far greater bad mutations until the picture is
painted? I don't think so. Natural selection explains the "survival of the
fittest" but not the "arrival of the fittest".
Atlas Moth Photo by Robert Perry,
Can you guess what this is? See the
Although not the same Emperor Moth you
get the picture. Note
even the lighting in the dark pupil of
Dinosaur Fossil Yields Pliable Soft
Tissue and Blood Vessels!
In the March 25, 2005 issue of
"Science" it was reported that Dr. Mary Schweitzer and her team found Dino
soft tissue and pliable blood vessels after the hind limb of a T-REX was
cracked open in order to transport it from the field. The T-Rex fossil
(allegedly 68 million years old) was found in the Hell Creek Formation of
Montana within a soft (read porous) sandstone. The fossil was found in a
"disarticulated" state and the sandstone was interpreted as "estuarine" in
origin. Don't be dismayed by the technical words. Disarticulated means the
fossil had been broken apart and estaurine means the fossil had been found
in sediments sorted and laid down by flood waters. Kind of reads better
without the technical words eh! How would your body stay together being
pounded by mud flows in fast moving water!
Anyways, it was quite a surprise to
find soft tissue and pliable blood vessels and possibly some blood cell
remains in an allegedly 68 million year fossil. It was thought that at
the outside the tissue and blood vessels could have lasted no more than
100,000 years (although I would question even this number). As you might
guess, quite a contradiction to the evolutionary religion. But on the other
hand fits the creation model of most dinosaurs perishing in flood laid
deposits some 4,400 years ago very well indeed!
A: The arrow shows that the
demineralized tissue fragment is flexible and resilient and, when stretched
returns to its original shape. Which defies belief that this is really
millions of years old.
B: Parts of demineralized bone which
could endure repeated hydration and dehydration and remain elastic
C: Parts of the demineralized bone
showing fibrous nature which should not exist if this fossil was millions of
Photo credit: Mary Schweitzer
Soft flexible dinosaur blood vessel
and cellular remains within
Well, Sherlock the evidence looks
pretty fresh doesn't it. Dr. Schweitzer has embarked on a hunt to find
similar evidence but she still has her evolutionary glasses on. We pray that
her eyes might be opened as well as many others to where the evidence truly
video as Dr Mary Schweitzer is interviewed here!
THE INFAMOUS ROYAL TYRRELL
MUSEUM Great Fossils Bad Story
December 16, 2000
It is amazing how many warm water
fossils are found in the Arctic and Antarctic regions as well as the prairies of Western
Canada. How did these get there? Of course without a canopy protected pre-flood world,
giving moderate weather from pole to pole, you have to dream up all kinds of improbable
impossibilities. Did continents really spin around like a ball bearing every so often to
give each continent their share of time in the tropics? Really a physical, mathematical
and engineering impossibility! No, is it because the collapse of the canopy at Noahs
flood brought tremendous climatic change and the flood fossilized warm weather animals and
plants in areas of the world which had previously been protected by that canopy?
This fish is said to have died swallowing another
fish whose fossilized remains can be seen within the bigger fishs digestive cavity.
If any fossil typifies sudden, rapid burial in sediments laid down by water this one does.
The problem here is that there are literally billions of fish in fossil beds around the
world, which have been suddenly entombed in like manner. Some have died half eating
another fish! Talk about the "Last Supper". As the creation model has pointed
out you only get fossils by rapid burial and lithification in sediments laid down by
water. The whole world is full of these fossil beds. Noahs flood with an internal
meltdown of the earth would provide ample power and energy to accomplish this.
The caption reads, "The
development of the horse provides a classic example of evolution. Like most animals horses
have a long history. But horses are different because we have a remarkably complete record
of their evolution."
This display at the Royal Tyrrell is almost as
flawed as the fictitious ape-man series they used to have with the Queen of England at the
end of the line. The "Horse Series" is a speculative fabrication of a rock
badger or African Hyrax with possibly various members of the horse "kind" plus
perhaps two other "kinds" arranged to "prove" a prior belief in
evilution. Circular reasoning at its deceptive best.
ERRONEOUS EVILUTIONARY ASSUMPTIONS USED:
1. No creator, therefore
everything had to come about by time, chance, and random processes. In other words you
came from a big rock cooling down in space.
2. Sedimentary layers were laid down over immense
periods of time therefore fossils in different layers lived at different times.
3. Common structures (homology) such as arms, legs,
wings, etc. mean that fossils are related to one another by some unknown evilutionary
These assumptions, if accepted, lead to
"proving" evilution by ordering fossils based on these assumptions. How many
taxpayer dollars have been wasted on this never ending quest to "discover where we
came from without a creator".
Each of the above assumptions should be rejected.
Sediments were laid down at virtually the same time during and after Noahs flood
engulfing billions of fossils along the way. This means that there is no great time span
available and the fossils lived at the same time. Common structures just mean that living
things were designed to live in a common world therefore common designs for a common
world. Ordering the series from smallest to largest and from 3-toed to 1-toed is purely
arbitrary and offers no evidence for evilution except in the minds of those so engaged.
They all lived contemporaneously just as the Shetland pony, the Clydesdale and the Hyrax
The physical fossil evidence contradicts even
evilutionary assumptions. Horse fossils have been found in the same rock layers showing
that they were contemporaneously living at the same time.
National Geographic (January, 1981, p. 74)
identifies the so-called early horse Pliohippus and the allegedly "modern" horse
Equus as contemporary in a volcanic site in Nebraska.
Creation Research Society Quarterly (vol. 10, March,
1974, p. 196) In NE Oregon a 3-toed Neohipparion and a 1-toed Pliohippus were found in the
same rock formation.
FOSSILS ALLEGEDLY MILLIONS OF YEARS OLD VERSUS THEIR
July 29, 1999
The following photos are courtesy of Dr. Joachim
Scheven and highlight examples of fossils with their living counterparts (or cousins). Dr.
Scheven has a creation web site at:
We are not saying that these examples are exactly
the same (in some cases more like cousins). We do acknowledge "variation within a
kind" already built in by genetic programming. What we intend for you to ask yourself
is, are these basically the same? These fossils allegedly lived millions of years ago but
is there any evidence of evolution between the fossil and its living counterpart? If the
basic form of each is the same, would this not fit well with fossils formed only 4,300
years ago in flood laid sediments?
Sassafras (root beer tree) fossil
version/ living version
Zacryptocerus Ant in Caribbean
Amber (allegedly 25 to 40 million years old) fossil version
Zacryptocerus Ant (Mexico) living version
Prawn fossil (allegedly 150
million years old)
Prawn living version
Mosquito fossil version
(allegedly 25 to 40 million years old)
Mosquito living version
Do these all look basically the same even though
there is supposed to be millions of years between them? Where do your conclusions lead?
PREDICTING THE FUTURE IN ADVANCE??
Posted February 26, 1999
The European Community Commemorative
Coin and Stamp reveals some interesting features. Notice the coin has a WOMAN riding a
SCARLET BEAST over WATER. Notice the stamp has a WOMAN riding a SCARLET BEAST over 7
hills. Now go read Daniel chapter 7 and Revelation chapter 17. These verses call for a
Revived Roman Empire united with a false religious system headquartered in Rome (the city
of 7 hills). This political/religious empire is identified as the last one before Christ
returns. Is the European Unions choice of symbolism a coincidence??
WHAT IS THIS? A PLESIOSAUR OR
A BASKING SHARK?
Posted February 26, 1999
Looks like a Plesiosaur to me,
the shark diagram I found done by an unbiased evolutionist looks PRETTY LAME to me! Japan
thought so also, see the commemorative stamp below.
On April 25, 1977 the Japanese fishing ship Zuiyo
Maru caught this decomposing carcass in its nets off the coast of New Zealand. It was
photographed and some tissue samples were taken but the carcass was thrown back overboard.
Japan even issued a commemorative stamp of a Plesiosaur (see below). However, a great hue
and cry came up from the evolutionists that this could not be a Plesiosaur but must be a
basking shark. Well, Sherlock, what do you think? Could a Plesiosaur have survived
extinction if Noahs flood happened only some 4,300 years ago?
SCIENTISTS KEEN TO STUDY DINOSAURS INTERNAL
Calgary Herald, March 26, 1998
This article states that they have found a
fossilized baby dinosaur with muscle fibers and some internal organs also present in
fossilized form. The article states that this dinosaur lived 113 million years ago in
Lets take some time to think about what this
article is saying and the worldview it is based upon. First of all, how do you get a
fossil? Evolution says that things were slowly buried over millions of years or they might
acknowledge a river flood but definitely localized. This idea which is a foundation of the
evolutionary worldview is entirely false if you think about it. You can only get this type
of fossil if the creature was rapidly buried under catastrophic circumstances involving
mud, water and cementing agents. The creature must be buried quickly so oxygen and the
normal decay processes cannot begin their work. If this creature died and lay on the
surface the body and bones would decay to dust very rapidly leaving no trace! Did you
realize the world is full of billions of fossils in innumerable graveyards buried in a
tangled mess in water deposited sediments? This is not an isolated river flood folks!
Consider the age of the fossil as being 113 million
years. You know fossils arent found with a date on them. Do you know how this date
was arrived at? It may surprise you. This date is based on a "geologic column"
invented in the 1800s by Charles Lyell. It is based upon Lyells BELIEF in
evolution. It was created to show simple life forms at the bottom with more complex life
forms at the top. Then each group was assigned a hypothetical age ASSUMING EVOLUTION WAS
TRUE! This hypothetical column does not exist in the real world of sediments and rock
layers. In the real world you find missing layers, out of order layers (simple fossil
layers lying on top of complex fossil layers), continuous deposition features etc.. There
is no real scientific evidence to support the dates on the geologic column.
Does the fossil evidence mentioned above support a
worldview of evolution or the Biblical worldview of a young earth and the worldwide flood
recorded by Noah? Think about it as someone who is given a supposedly eye witness account
(Genesis) of a worldwide flood destroying all life? As an astute investigator where does
this article truly lead?